

There we found a very clearly statistically significant relationship.


So we ran the same analysis in the 2003–2012 dataset. This was barely statistically significant in the 2012 dataset, His wife chaired the White House Council of Economic Advisors in 20. Romer is a notable Berkeley economist, and Here, as with the rest of this fourth-and-2 analysis, we were inspired by aĢ002 paper by David Romer. Was calculated using both third- and fourth-and-2. Zone on third-and-short is pretty similarly successful to going for it on fourth-and-short, so we used both types of plays in this analysis. It turns out, though, that going for the end In the last ten years, there have only been twenty-five instances where teams went for it on fourth-and-goal at the 2-yard line. To see the analysis that yielded the 1.5% number. The very awesome Brian at Advanced NFL Stats does a great job ofĭescribing randomization and game theory. That is, the coach randomizes play calling enough to be unpredictable while still favoring the more advantageous plays.
#Nfl play by play data download#
You can download the structured data in Excel to see the specifics of how we calculated various fields from the original data: Some plays are missing, and a very small number of plays have some inaccurate data.īut overall the dataset is comprehensive and accurate.įor example, the dataset only omits four of the roughly 1,000 field goals attempted in 2012. The original data does have a few errors here and there, not all of which could be cleaned up. Which we interpreted into structured data using Excel. Advanced NFL Stats is mostly free-text play descriptions,
